Ataraxiom – the Philosophy of Ataraxia as an Axiom

The preponderant phenomenologist in me believes my own experiences to be the only truth and thus denies the arguments in this article. The residual Chaote in me finds the arguments about ataraxia here to be highly persuasive. But I’m not mind-fucked. I can live peacefully like that. But is that in itself an “ataraxiom”?

Things that make you go Hmm…

neurometaphysics

meme – ataraxiom

noun;  hybrid of “ataraxia” (Ἀταραξία “tranquility”)+ “axiom“.

~<{{{WARNING!}}}>~

~<{{will be seriously challenging to modern ‘skeptics’ and people of faith alike! }}}>~

.

Definition

Ataraxia is the entelechy (inner purpose and inherent end) of philosophy – or at the least of the philosophies of Epicurus the materialist and Pyrrho the skeptic alike. Depending on your view, ataraxia is the goal or at least the result of philosophy and the physical sciences.

In Pyrrho’s skepticism, nothing is known with certainty and there seems to be no way to ever come to certainty. There is no rock-bottom reality as far as we can perceive. Since everything would have to be proved by everything else, all argument is either circular or a chain that hangs from nothing and never ends. In other words, if we start with any positive statement, such as “I…

View original post 3,042 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s