The Book of Baphomet: Some Thoughts

I’m not a Chaos Magician and don’t view the world through a Chaote perspective. So I’m not of a mind to review The Book of Baphomet by Julian Vayne and Nikki Wyrd — I couldn’t do them justice because I disagree with many of Chaos Magick’s basic premises, the entrenched opinions found in it, etc. So I’m just going to jot down some thoughts and impressions.

The first two thirds or so of the book is a treasure house of Baphomet lore. If you have any Baphometic inclinations you should read the book for the lore alone. There’s no way I could summarize this section so if interested — and I know many of you are because my Baphomet post is my most popular to date — then just read the book.

The book then turns into an excursus on entheogens and sex magic. Not the lore or techniques but the experiences. It was interesting at first but I got bored with the sex and drugs after a while. But even here there are some passages of moving poetic beauty, like finding occasional twenty dollar bills while on a long walk through the mud. —It could be that I’m just jealous because I’m fresh out of entheogens, have no one to watch over me while I’m tripping, and my partner isn’t into magic, not at all. Yes, I’m jealous, but the section was still boring at times.

Then came an extended Baphometic working, Chaos Magick style. If you’re into Chaos Magick then this will prove most interesting to you. If you’re also into Baphomet you’ll probably want to give this section a try.

It’s a good book, Vayne and Wyrd’s Book of Baphomet. It’s a good read, all told.

One of the first two magic books I ever bought was Liber Null and Psychonaut by Peter J. Carroll, the most famous of the founders of what soon became known as Chaos Magick. In the Psychonaut half of the book, Carroll incorporates a cool Baphometish illustration and devotes a couple of pages to Baphomet. To him, Baphomet is the perfect notion of what a God should be to the Chaos Magician. He sees Baphomet in Hir androgyny, Hir mixtures of various species and phylums, of apparent good and evil, as the perfect picture of reality in miniature. And the ultimate reality to Carroll back in those days was the Kia, the universal life force/Chaos/Source/atmospheric I/etc. Baphomet has since then evolved into the God(dess) of the biosphere. Or the egregore of the biosphere, i.e., the giant thoughtform or “living notion” of the biosphere. Anyway, it’s all very Chaotick, in the best of ways — I enjoy reading Chaos Magick, I just don’t practice or believe in it — but this idea of the nature of Baphomet leaves a funny taste in my mouth.

Baphomet as Deity of the Biosphere … this seems almost like an article of faith. They make a case for it being true, and a pretty good one, but I think if ones calls the shots as they see them, this idea is a Chaote axiom. Axioms are truths so basic they can’t be parsed any further. —I don’t agree with this axiom. The authors of course have a lot of personal experience from their years of working with Baphomet. I don’t have a lot of personal experience. But there’s nothing stopping a possible original Baphomet from existing alongside a Chaote Baphomet. Or maybe Baphomet grew a new limb, so to speak, one that Chaotes interact with. Or … and on and on and on … the possibilities are endless. But it smacks of an article of faith to me, something Chaotes say they don’t have (but of course, like all humans, they do). No matter how enjoyable the book is, I disagree with its most fundamental idea.

Above I wrote I don’t have a lot of personal experience working with Baphomet. But I’ve been trying to establish contact via a magical image of Hir (Levi’s famous illustration, of course). A few days ago, I established a slight connection, I think. The pre-verbal echoes were echoing away in my head but my mouth only caught one word out of those reverberations to speak aloud: Wisdom, my lips said of their own accord. What kind of wisdom? What’s the subject here, what’s the verb? —I don’t know yet, but I intend to continue to try and find out.

7 thoughts on “The Book of Baphomet: Some Thoughts

  1. Alternative review on my blog, plus a whole load of things Nikki and Julian would prefer you not to read. Thanks.

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      Thank you, Nathaniel, for the comment. I read your alternative review and can see your POV clearly. You have given me some food for thought, and for that I thank you.

      Much love. —Rachel Izabella

      • Thank you for your reply Rachel. Best wishes to you. I would also be interested in reading your opinions on how the Chaos current has failed. You mention that you have various disagreements with ‘Chaos theory’, as have I. For myself their concentration on ‘enchantment’, which has great appeal to ego and hubris, and their almost total neglect of divination, the art of introspection and the quest for wisdom, is most telling in itself.

        • Rachel Izabella says:

          Nathaniel — forgive my delay in replying to your comment. I do think the Chaos Current has failed most Chaos Magicians. No, that’s not right. I think that most Chaos Magicians have failed the Chaos Current. But not all of them have. To wit, see Gordon White’s magnificent books The Chaos Protocols and Star.Ships. Gordon is doing it right. I would be hard panressed to name another prominent Chaos Magician who is doing it Right (TM). I do know several Chaos Magicians via the Internet who are doing it right, but none of them is what I would call prominent nor have they published books. So Chaos Magic hasn’t failed, it’s just gone underground for the most part, with the exception of Gordon White. The Book of Baphomet is in my not so humble opinion a failure for it does not deal with Baphomet as I know It/Her/Him. But that is Unverified Personal Gnosis on my part. This isn’t much of an answer to your question but my blog is pretty much dead and I haven’t dealt with the Chaos Current in a long time with the exception of my sigil work, and sigils have pretty much become common currency with all sorts of practitioners outside the main Chaos Current.

          I hope that helps a little bit. It’s all I have for you at the moment.

          –Rachel Izabella

    • ‘Smellyshedboyminus666’ is an account that exits purely to troll my own posts exposing the IOT and their involvement with organised child abuse – that is why the avatar shown is a picture of myself as ‘Grobbly’, a clown character I created around 2008. The account it is in fact either Julian Vayne or/and Nikki Wyrd. It is well known that convicted paedophile Colin Batley was a member of their organisation and no it isn’t just me saying so. The fact I am so instantly trolled wherever my posts appear should certainly cause alarm to anyone paying attention. I have complained about these Id-IOTs to the police and for the moment their activity seems to have died down.

      When they created this sockpuppet the mistakenly believed I had no support from the occult community. As the years have gone by they have been proven very wrong.

      • Rachel Izabella says:

        Good for you, Nathaniel. It pays to have friends, both flesh and blood friends and non-corporeal friends in this business. The IOT stopped being relevant a long time ago IMHO. Protect yourself well, my friend.

        –Rachel Izabella

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s