Baphomet [For Rick]

Colorful Baphomet

Image by Maxine Miller

Rick Derks, whose blog is yet another must-read, asked me for my views on Baphomet, after I had said in a FaceBook comment that “I have *views* about Baphomet”, expressed an interest in those views. Rick, you have your privacy settings tweaked so that I can’t message you, though we’re mutual FB friends! (Rick also clearly overestimates my level of Gnosis!) —Then I thought to myself that putting my personal, idiosyncratic “*views*” and whence I came by them into words might result in a decent little post, so … here they are, my views on Baphomet.

You can find some of this info on Wikipedia — the good stuff you can’t.

One of the first two magic books I bought, was Liber Null and Psychonaut, by Peter J. Carroll, co-founder of what soon became known as Chaos Magick and of the Illuminates of Thanateros, which has included such luminaries as William S. Burroughs. —Burroughs should need no link. If you don’t know who he is, read all his books. Start now! I started with Cities of the Red Night. Maybe the first Postmodernist writer in English, his books in the most literal of myriad ways are magic.

Anyways, Carroll in Psychonaut has a short chapter on Baphomet. Now Chaos Magick’s most famous slogan is Nothing is true. Everything is permitted, reputedly coined by Hassan-i Sabbah, founder of the Hashshashin or Assassins, back in the 12th century. In reality it was Friedrich Nietzsche who first put that sentiment into those words, in On the Genealogy of Morals. Burroughs used the phrase at least once or maybe several times, I can’t recall (meaning, you should find out for yourself), best of all in the marvelous, blasphemous invocation at the beginning of Cities of the Red Night, and he’s often mistakenly credited as its originator.

Back to Baphomet. Carroll’s chapter on Him (for convenience’ sake I’ll call Baphomet Him) took the Chaos Magick slant. Baphomet was a perfect God for the Chaote, but then — Nothing is true. Everything is permitted. That leaves the nature and ontology of Baphomet — just who or what is Baphomet? — complete mysteries. Having experienced spirits as real already (read about that here), I wondered if He might not be as real as you or I. So many other impossible things had turned out to be extremely possible and as real as a bullet already, and something about Baphomet was just so compelling. Yeah, I though, He’s real…


[N.B.: It’s all shite, pardon the language, that Baphomet was the Goat-God of the Knights Templar. I like the pic though.]

Eventually I found Eliphas Levi’s book Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, which contains the familiar infamous image of Baphomet, and the following explication of that image:

The goat on the frontispiece carries the sign of the pentagram on the forehead, with one point at the top, a symbol of light, his two hands forming the sign of occultism, the one pointing up to the white moon of Chesed, the other pointing down to the black one of Geburah. This sign expresses the perfect harmony of mercy with justice. His one arm is female, the other male like the ones of the androgyne of Khunrath, the attributes of which we had to unite with those of our goat because he is one and the same symbol. The flame of intelligence shining between his horns is the magic light of the universal balance, the image of the soul elevated above matter, as the flame, whilst being tied to matter, shines above it. The beast’s head expresses the horror of the sinner, whose materially acting, solely responsible part has to bear the punishment exclusively; because the soul is insensitive according to its nature and can only suffer when it materializes. The rod standing instead of genitals symbolizes eternal life, the body covered with scales the water, the semi-circle above it the atmosphere, the feathers following above the volatile. Humanity is represented by the two breasts and the androgyne arms of this sphinx of the occult sciences.

In other words, his image of Baphomet sums up everything, and in a good way, sort of like the meaning of Life, the Universe and Everything in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, if only the answer in Douglas Adams’s books weren’t so silly. —And then in Magic (Book 4), Aleister Crowley riffs on Levi’s basic idea and states at great length that Baphomet is “the hieroglyph of arcane perfection”. In other words, Baphomet symbolizes the completion of the Great Work, the ultimate goal of magical mysticism  in the Western Tradition.

Word is that the Great Work is a ɢᴏᴏᴅ ᴛʜɪɴɢ, and I believe it. I respect the Great Work, but I can’t tell you what alchemists and practitioners of High Magick mean by the phrase. —I’ll tell you what I think it means. Since it’s the goal, the end, and the completion of magic and mysticism, it must mean the attainment of Absolute Perfection: and that Perfection must be a permanent state the practitioner dwells in for all eternity thereafter, and not a mere temporary state or flash of insight. Think of the Enlightenment of the Buddha. Think of Master Yeshua ben Yosef’s (or perhaps ben Panthera’s) — perhaps the greatest of all Mages, called the Son of Solomon, who before him had been the greatest Mage of Antiquity, according to both Jew and Pagan (Pagan and Jew were also agreed on the point of Jesus as magician in the decades and first centuries after his death, vide Morton Smith’s Jesus the Magician and Marvin Meyers’s Ancient Christian Magic) — what I’m trying to say is, think of this “heretical” view of Jesus becoming a Son of God, which in Ancient Hebrew is simply idiomatic for a God, through magical and mystical means.

Baphomet then as symbol of this mighty deed exists primarily at what I’ll call the Perfection Level. Gods exist, I’m sure,  at the Perfection Level, but also lower down, all the way down to the lower Astral, where They can behave with all the pettiness of the most trivial Greek or Hindu myth you can remember. Baphomet is different. He must exist a little further down the Perfection Scale towards materiality and manifestation, but only enough that He can have an effect on our physical Universe. For example, one can pray to Baphomet: Baphomet can answer that prayer. Baphomet has no existence, as Gods do, on the Lower Astral. Therefore Baphomet is not a God. Nor would it seem that He is a perfected human.

So what is Baphomet?

I’m a polytheist but I’m also an animist. As animism is supposedly an antiquated and obsolete word, call me a panpsychist, a coinage of Peter J. Carroll’s. That means I believe everything great or small possesses a soul. No … divine spark is a better term here I think than soul. (Allow me to skip a justification for that statement, let’s hurry along.) If everything really means everything, then even a symbol or a hieroglyph of arcane perfection must possess this spark. And that is why I believe that Baphomet is a living Entity. If you think that’s a strange idea, the last of the great original and creative Kabbalists, Isaac ben Luria, claimed that every word we speak is an angel. An angel! (I believe it, by the way.)

That Baphomet is a living Entity existing at the Perfection Level is however still not a good enough answer. So What is Baphomet?

I found the missing puzzle pieces in a blog post by Jason Miller and in its comments. Jason is both a practicing Christian and a priest no less (he may even be a Wandering Bishop by now, I’m not sure), and also a Ngakpa in Vajrayana Buddhism. He put in the years and years of study and practice in both religions and received the required sacraments and empowerments to become a priest (or maybe even bishop) with Apostolic Succession and also a (in Wikipedia’s words) “non-monastic practitioner of Vajrayana, shamanism, Tibetan medicine, Tantra and Dzogchen amongst other traditions, disciplines and arts” — a Ngakpa. I don’t know how he performs this balancing act, but I have no doubt that being a practicing Buddhist first and cultivating non-attachment has a lot to do with it. —Anyway, Jason had to consolidate his Buddhist and Christian altars, or magical working spaces, into one. He felt the dissonance rising, traditions clashing. What to do? He hung a picture of Baphomet higher than any images of either the Buddha or Christ or the many other saints and spirits he works with. All was peaceful. Baphomet had brought a yet higher harmony and that harmony prevailed. How? Some excerpts from the comments follow, all made by Jason himself…

“Baphomet is not a separate being in the way that most dieties are. He is a symbol of the spiritual work itself, and the resulting goal. Yet, there is also a consciousness behind it that can be invoked similar to a diety… ”

“I think that it is the specific lack of a historical cult and connection to particular culture that made him ideal to tie it all together…”

“By real being I do not mean that he doesn’t manifest as a being, can be invoked, and can act as a god. [Jason made a grammatical error here, but the meaning is plain.] He certainly can, as can Kuntuzangpo. The difference is about Egoistic manifestation further down the chain of manifestation. There is no personal ego drive like there is with many beings. Many gods seem to straddle both the transcendent and cosmic as well as the immanent and egoistic. Baphomet seems beyond this, though certainly some on the LHP would see him as the very embodyment of ego.”

I think Mr. Miller’s words speak for themselves. They did for me. My pursuit of just who and what Baphomet is, was satisfied.There is vastly more Baphomet lore than what I’ve sketched here. There are numberless theories. Read The Da Vinci Code, for example. Here you’ll only find the train of thought that lead me to my “*views*”, which pretty much are summarized in Jason’s comments above, the views that Rick Derks was interested in, way back up at the top.

This is my longest post so far. Well, I need to practice expository writing anyway…

(LHP, if you don’t know, means Left Hand Path. The phrase has utterly, completely different meanings in Hinduism and Buddhism in the East, on the one hand, and the many “dark” groups in the West, who go by the same moniker. The Temple of Set and the Fraternitas Saturni are two examples of such Western groups. Many of the Western Left Hand Path are pleasant, intelligent, reasonable people. A few at least, the ones with Neanderthal brows and three X chromosomes, are the sort of people who enjoy smelling their own farts. —Hey! – no philosophy has perfect adherents…)


20 thoughts on “Baphomet [For Rick]

  1. Skyllaros says:

    Wow thanks for writing this up. I’m humbled that you answered my question in an entire blog post. I don’t think I misjudged your gnosis at all 😉 Seriously good stuff here.

    i think a lot of what you said rings true to me. I do think “He” is and can be a communicated with as a God, but is also more. I love Jason’s thoughts on the matter, as is to be expected! I don’t know exactly what Baphomet is, but my thoughts are much in the same vein as yours here. Again, thank you so much for taking to the time out to write this up.

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      I think what “He” is, is as clear as such matters get (somewhat clear but never clear enough to satisfy). For me it’s “how” such a seemingly unique entity came into being and where from that are the fascinating questions because they’re so tantalizing. —As for the blog post, my “gnosis” … meh, I have to write so I had to write about something. Or rather: Happy to oblige!

  2. thefirstdark says:

    Reblogged this on The Darkness in the Light and commented:
    Loving this, finally some straight forward and on Baphomet.

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      Thank you, First Dark. —I gave a miss to a ton of Baphomet info and “info” out there, only including what led me to my opinion.

  3. […] makes everything better! Isn’t that right Baphomet and […]

  4. Gerry says:

    Have you read Julian Vayne and Niki Wyrd’s ‘ Book of Baphomet? well worth checking out. Love your blog btw.

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      In fact I was just now reading the Book of Baphomet on my Nook. It’s giving me many new ideas. After reading it, after attempting to make some sort of mediumistic or astral contact with Baphomet, after doing some investigation into, for example, the early market for “Baphomets” — little figures of Baphomet sold to the gullible as ancient Egyptian artifacts (what did they *look* like?) — I may reevaluate my working theory of Hir. Or not, it depends on what I find. Expect a followup to my Baphomet post at some future date. —And thanks so much for the complement!

  5. […] no way I could summarize this section so if interested — and I know many of you are because my Baphomet post is my most popular to date — then just read the […]

  6. I am a witch and find that the image and statue of Baphomet balance and consolidate the duality of deity for sure. Decades ago a friend painted her own version of Baphe-metis which is more Bi/TS than Levi’s bearded drawing where S/he has a phallus but the testicles are shaped to form a Yoni, much more aesthetically pleasing.

  7. “As animism is supposedly an antiquated and obsolete word, …”

    Another memo I missed. I will have to have a chat with the kids in the mail room.

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      If I can find the quote I’ll source it for you. The gist is that animism is a construct of Western humankind imposed upon Archaic peoples far too sophisticated for any such stuff and nonsense. I think that’s today’s lore in academia. Motherfrakkers.

      Much love, Rachel

  8. Leigha says:

    Cool post! I have been seeing the image of “Him” so much lately, and you are so right for expressing your thoughts outwardly! I can agree with many of your conclusions and I believe we have similare core beliefs, and I am learning how to use correct terms. But, as the saying goes, to speak about magic is to break the spell (or such,) so I think that though “He” can represent exacting magic through whichever manner one chooses, I think to actually use his image can be counter useful. Maybe that is why this is such a scary image for some, I too am a tid bit weary. The Buddha did not initially allow his image to be used as his representation, but instead started with his feet, then his hands, and then his image. (this is my favorite story explaining the ideas of humility and faith etc.) since magic is old old old!.. It makes sense to be exposed regularly to such an image (Baphomet) and maybe it is time for people to process this image and it’s meaning just as thoroughly as possible, such as I am attempting through reading posts like yours. I am just not sure that I can personally worship the gods or anything but “God” which I believe (yes, I adopted this idea) is the collective spirit body. 🙂

  9. Cypher Lee says:

    I love the deeply detailed color image of Baphomet you have here. Do you know where I can buy a copy for framing?

    • Rachel Izabella says:

      No, I’m afraid I don’t, Cypher. I don’t remember where I stole that image from. A high quality color inkjet is probably your best option. Much love — Rachel Izabella

    • I think i saw that image on a Tumblr page so who knows who the source is, and once an image is on Tumblr, even if someone has it listed as copyrighted, it is reblogged so many times it might as well be considered public, which is a shame for the artist. If you email me again at i can send you all my Baphomet images and a document i wrote in 1990 called “The Book of Baphomet – from Gnosticke Dualism to Z-Aeonic Magicke”.

    • Nomad says:

      The artist of that image in the post is Maxine Miller.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s